Subjective vs objective description of judgment policy
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Subjective Vs Objective Image Quality
Image quality demands have been investigated for different applications of stereoscopic evaluation. For that purpose, the quality of image pairs was judged by experienced stereo operators in subjective sc ales for contrast, sharpness, granularity, interpretability and overall quality. The judgment was made in real working situations with the images oriented in stereo instruments. The result sho...
متن کاملSubjective vs objective evaluations of smile esthetics.
INTRODUCTION The aim of this study was to analyze the relationships between subjective evaluations of posttreatment smiles captured with clinical photography and rated by a panel of orthodontists and parents of orthodontic patients, and objective evaluations of the same smiles from the Smile Mesh program (TDG Computing, Philadelphia, Pa). METHODS The clinical photographs of 48 orthodontically...
متن کاملAssessing subjective vs objective cognitive artifact usage
For decades, IS researchers have discussed the reliability of subjective measurements to assess actual artifact usage. Especially in experimental settings, as in the design science context for instance, the participants’ usage data of the evaluated artifact represents an important point of analysis. However, collecting objective usage data, (i.e. logfiles) is often not feasible depending on the...
متن کاملObjective vs. Subjective Scales: The Challenge That the Scale Type Poses to the JUDGEMAP Model of Context Sensitive Judgment
The paper presents a computational model of context sensitive judgment, called JUDGEMAP, which has been developed for modeling judgment on a subjective scale. This paper presents an attempt to apply the same model to the case of judgment on an objective scale. This is a big challenge since the behavioral data are showing the opposite type of effects. Thus we have repeatedly obtained contrast ef...
متن کاملSubjective vs. Objective Evaluation of Ontological Statements with Crowdsourcing
In this paper we propose and test a methodology for evaluation of statements of a multi-viewpoint ontology by crowdsourcing. The task for the workers was to assess each of the given statement as true statements, controversial viewpoint statement or error. Typically, in crowdsourcing experiments the workers are asked for their personal opinions on the given subject. However, in our case their ab...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Psychonomic Science
سال: 1970
ISSN: 0033-3131
DOI: 10.3758/bf03335762